Computers are increasingly finding
their way to Board and Committee meetings. Participants use them
to view reports on-line and communicate with one another. Computers
can be used to e-mail a request to the Chair to be added to the
speakers’ queue (instead of raising hands). Those who use
computers in meetings enjoy and appreciate having them.
So what is the problem?
The main difficulty is that computers can become
a distraction. If caution is not applied, they can reduce members’
ability to focus on discussions, and may thereby diminish the
group’s ability to make informed decisions. Examples?
A computer may fail part way through a meeting,
meaning that the member might be more focused on technological
glitches, and less focused on the meeting.
Another risk is that individuals may engage
in sending or receiving e-mails from outside parties, possibly
at the expense of focusing on the meeting and the decision making
process. Software features should be installed to prevent outside
interference.
In the case of a public body, such as a municipal
council or a school board, a member’s excessive focus on
the computer screen may convey the impression that the individual
is not focused on the business of the public body. For a citizen
speaking before the body, a lack of full attention from elected
officials can be insulting. An excessive focus on the screen can
also raise public suspicion and mistrust: What might be so interesting
to watch? Might it be a computer game? Might the elected official
be surfing the Internet or receiving e-mail messages from constituents,
possibly interfering in the process and creating a distraction?
The above risks do not negate the benefits of
legitimate uses of computers in meetings, as long as such uses
do not become a distraction or have other negative impacts on
the process.
|